Carbon sequestration and geo engineering and terestrial bio-sequestration of carbon
Carbon sequestration is the process of capture and
long-term storage of atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO and may refer specifically
to:
- "The process of removing carbon
from the atmosphere and depositing it in a reservoir." When carried
out deliberately, this may also be referred to as carbon dioxide removal,
which is a form of geoengineering.
- The process of carbon capture
and storage, where carbon dioxide is removed from flue gases, such as on
power stations, before being stored in underground reservoirs.
- Natural biogeochemical cycling
of carbon between the atmosphere and
reservoirs, such as by chemical weathering of rocks.
Carbon
sequestration describes long-term storage of carbon dioxide or other forms of carbon to either mitigate or defer global
warming and avoid
dangerous climate change. It has been proposed as a way to slow the atmospheric and
marine accumulation of greenhouse gases, which are released by burning fossil fuels.
Carbon
dioxide is naturally captured from the atmosphere through biological, chemical
or physical processes. Some anthropogenic sequestration techniques exploit
these natural processes, while some use entirely artificial processes.
Carbon
dioxide may be captured as a pure by-product in processes related to petroleum
refining or from flue gases from power generation. CO2 sequestration includes the storage
part of carbon capture and storage, which refers to large-scale, permanent
artificial capture and sequestration of industrially produced CO2 using subsurface saline aquifers,
reservoirs, ocean water, aging oil fields, or other carbon sinks.
Biological processes
Biosequestration or carbon sequestration
through biological processes affects the global carbon cycle. Examples include
major climatic fluctuations, such as the Azolla event, which created the
current Arctic climate. Such processes created fossil fuels, as well as
clathrate and limestone. By manipulating such processes, geoengineers seek to enhance
sequestration.
Peat production
Peat bogs are a very important carbon store.
By creating new bogs, or enhancing existing ones, carbon can be sequestered.
Reforestation
Reforestation is the replanting of trees on
marginal crop and pasture lands to incorporate carbon from atmospheric CO2 into
biomass. For this process to succeed the carbon must not return to the
atmosphere from burning or rotting when the trees die. To this end, the trees
must grow in perpetuity or the wood from them must itself be sequestered, e.g.,
via biochar, bio-energy with carbon storage (BECS) or landfill. Short of growth
in perpetuity, however, reforestation with long-lived trees (>100 years) will
sequester carbon for a more graduated release, minimizing impact during the
expected carbon crisis of the 21st century.
Wetland restoration
Wetland soil is an important carbon sink;
14.5 % of the world’s soil carbon is found in wetlands, while only
6 % of the world’s land is composed of wetlands.
Agriculture
Globally, soils are estimated to contain
approximately 1,500 gigatons of organic carbon to 1 m depth, more than the
amount in vegetation and the atmosphere.
Modification of agricultural practices is a recognized
method of carbon sequestration as soil can act as an effective carbon sink
offsetting as much as 20 % of 2010 carbon dioxide emissions annually.
Carbon emission reduction methods in
agriculture can be grouped into two categories: reducing and/or displacing
emissions and enhancing carbon removal. Some of these reductions involve
increasing the efficiency of farm operations (i.e. more fuel-efficient
equipment) while some involve interruptions in the natural carbon cycle. Also,
some effective techniques (such as the elimination of stubble burning) can
negatively impact other environmental concerns (increased herbicide use to
control weeds not destroyed by burning).
Reducing
emissions
Increasing yields and efficiency generally
reduces emissions as well, since more food results from the same or less
effort. Techniques include more accurate use of fertilizers, less soil
disturbance, better irrigation, and crop strains bred for locally beneficial
traits and increased yields.
Replacing more energy intensive farming
operations can also reduce emissions. Reduced or no-till farming requires less
machine use and burns correspondingly less fuel per acre. However, no-till
usually increases use of weed-control chemicals and the residue now left on the
soil surface is more likely to release its CO2 to the atmosphere as it decays, reducing the net carbon reduction.
In practice, most farming operations that
incorporate post-harvest crop residues, wastes and byproducts back into the
soil provide a carbon storage benefit. This is particularly the case for
practices such as field burning of stubble - rather than releasing almost all
of the stored CO2 to the atmosphere, tillage incorporates the biomass back into the
soil where it can be absorbed and a portion of it stored permanently.
Enhancing carbon
removal
All crops absorb CO2 during growth and release it after harvest. The goal of
agricultural carbon removal is to use the crop and its relation to the carbon
cycle to permanently sequester carbon within the soil. This is done by
selecting farming methods that return biomass to the soil and enhance the
conditions in which the carbon within the plants will be reduced to its
elemental nature and stored in a stable state. Methods for accomplishing this
include:
- Use cover crops such as
grasses and weeds as temporary cover between planting seasons
- Concentrate livestock in
small paddocks for days at a time so they graze lightly but evenly. This
encourages roots to grow deeper into the soil. Stock also till the soil
with their hooves, grinding old grass and manures into the soil.
- Cover bare paddocks with hay
or dead vegetation. This protects soil from the sun and allows the soil to
hold more water and be more attractive to carbon-capturing microbes.
- Restore degraded land, which
slows carbon release while returning the land to agriculture or other use.
Agricultural sequestration practices may
have positive effects on soil, air, and water quality, be beneficial to
wildlife, and expand food production. On degraded croplands, an increase of
1 ton of soil carbon pool may increase crop yield by 20 to
40 kilograms per hectare of wheat, 10 to 20 kg/ ha for maize, and 0.5
to 1 kg/ha for cowpeas.
The effects of soil sequestration can be
reversed. If the soil is disrupted or tillage practices are abandoned, the soil
becomes a net source of greenhouse gases. Typically after 15 to 30 years
of sequestration, soil becomes saturated and ceases to absorb carbon. This
implies that there is a global limit to the amount of carbon that soil can hold.
Many factors affect the costs of carbon
sequestration including soil quality, transaction costs and various
externalities such as leakage and unforeseen environmental damage. Because
reduction of atmosperic CO2 is a long-term concern, farmers can be reluctant to adopt more
expensive agricultural techniques when there is not a clear crop, soil, or
economic benefit. Governments such as Australia and New Zealand are considering
allowing farmers to sell carbon credits once they document that they have
sufficiently increased soil carbon content.
Ocean-related
Iron
fertilization
Ocean iron fertilization is an example of
such a geoengineering technique. Iron fertilization attempts to encourage
phytoplankton growth, which removes carbon from the atmosphere for at least a
period of time. This technique is controversial due to limited understanding
its complete effects on the marine ecosystem including side effects and
possibly large deviations from expected behavior. Such effects potentially
include release of nitrogen oxides, and disruption of the ocean's nutrient
balance.
Natural iron fertilisation events (e.g.,
deposition of iron-rich dust into ocean waters) can enhance carbon
sequestration. Sperm whales act as agents of iron fertilisation when they
transport iron from the deep ocean to the surface during prey consumption and
defecation. Sperm whales have been shown to increase the levels of primary
production and carbon export to the deep ocean by depositing iron rich feces
into surface waters of the Southern Ocean. The iron rich feces causes
phytoplankton to grow and take up more carbon from the atmosphere. When the
phytoplankton dies, some of it sinks to the deep ocean and takes the
atmospheric carbon with it. By reducing the abundance of sperm whales in the
Southern Ocean, whaling has resulted in an extra 2 million tonnes of carbon
remaining in the atmosphere each year.
Urea
fertilization
Ian Jones proposes fertilizing the ocean
with urea, a nitrogen rich substance, to encourage phytoplankton growth. Australian
company Ocean Nourishment Corporation (ONC) plans to sink hundreds of tonnes of
urea into the ocean to boost CO2-absorbing phytoplankton growth as a way to combat climate change.
In 2007, Sydney-based ONC completed an experiment involving 1 tonne of
nitrogen in the Sulu Sea off the Philippines.
Mixing layers
Encouraging various ocean layers to mix can
move nutrients and dissolved gases around, offering avenues for geoengineering.
Mixing may be achieved by placing large vertical pipes in the oceans to pump
nutrient rich water to the surface, triggering blooms of algae, which store
carbon when they grow and export carbon when they die. This produces results
somewhat similar to iron fertilization. One side-effect is a short-term rise in
CO
2, which limits its
attractiveness.
Physical processes
Bio-energy with
carbon capture and storage (BECCS)
BECCS refers to biomass in power stations
and boilers that use carbon capture and storage. The carbon sequestered by the
biomass would be captured and stored, thus removing carbon dioxide from the
atmosphere.
This technology is sometimes referred to as bio-energy with carbon
storage, BECS, though this term can also refer to the carbon sequestration
potential in other technologies, such as biochar.
Burial
Burying biomass (such as trees) directly,
mimics the natural processes that created fossil fuels Landfills also represent
a physical method of sequestration.
Biochar burial
Biochar is charcoal created by pyrolysis of
biomass waste. The resulting material is added to a landfill or used as a soil
improver to create terra preta. Biogenic carbon is recycled naturally in the
carbon cycle. Pyrolysing it to biochar renders the carbon relatively inert so
that it remains sequestered in soil. Further, the soil encourages bulking with
new organic matter, which gives additional sequestration benefit.
In the soil, the carbon is unavailable for oxidation to CO2 and
consequential atmospheric release. This is one technique advocated by scientist
James Lovelock, creator of the Gaia hypothesis. According to Simon Shackley,
"people are talking more about something in the range of one to two
billion tonnes a year."
The mechanisms related to biochar are referred to as bio-energy with
carbon storage, BECS.
Ocean storage
River mouths bring large quantities of
nutrients and dead material from upriver into the ocean as part of the process
that eventually produces fossil fuels. Transporting material such as crop waste
out to sea and allowing it to sink exploits this idea to increase carbon
storage. International regulations on marine dumping may restrict or prevent
use of this technique.
Subterranean
injection
Carbon dioxide can be injected into depleted
oil and gas reservoirs and other geological features, or can be injected into
the deep ocean.
The first large-scale CO2 sequestration project which began in 1996 is called Sleipner, and
is located in the North Sea where Norway's StatoilHydro strips carbon dioxide
from natural gas with amine solvents and disposed of this carbon dioxide in a
deep saline aquifer. In 2000, a coal-fueled synthetic natural gas plant in
Beulah, North Dakota, became the world's first coal-using plant to capture and
store carbon dioxide, at the Weyburn-Midale Carbon Dioxide Project.
CO2 has been used extensively in enhanced crude oil recovery operations
in the United States beginning in 1972. There are in excess of 10,000 wells
that inject CO2 in the state of Texas alone. The gas comes in part from
anthropogenic sources, but is principally from large naturally occurring
geologic formations of CO2. It is transported to the oil-producing fields through a large
network of over 5,000 kilometres (3,100 mi) of CO2 pipelines. The use of CO2 for enhanced oil recovery (EOR) methods in heavy oil reservoirs in
the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin (WCSB) has also been proposed. However,
transport cost remains an important hurdle. An extensive CO2 pipeline system does not yet exist in the WCSB. Athabasca oil sands
mining that produces CO2 is hundreds of kilometers north of the subsurface Heavy crude oil
reservoirs that could most benefit from CO2 injection.
Chemical processes
Carbon, in the form of CO2 can be removed from the atmosphere by chemical processes, and
stored in stable carbonate mineral forms. This process is known as 'carbon
sequestration by mineral carbonation' or mineral sequestration. The process
involves reacting carbon dioxide with abundantly available metal oxides–either
magnesium oxide (MgO) or calcium oxide (CaO)–to form stable carbonates. These
reactions are exothermic and occur naturally (e.g., the weathering of rock over
geologic time periods).
CaO
+ CO2 → CaCO3
MgO
+ CO2 → MgCO3
Calcium and magnesium are found in nature typically as calcium and
magnesium silicates (such as forsterite and serpentinite) and not as binary
oxides. For forsterite and serpentine the reactions are:
Mg2SiO4 + 2 CO2 = 2 MgCO3 + SiO2
Mg3Si2O5(OH)4+ 3 CO2 = 3 MgCO3 + 2 SiO2 + 2 H2O
The following table lists principal metal oxides of Earth's crust.
Theoretically up to 22 % of this mineral mass is able to form carbonates.
|
Earthen
Oxide |
Percent
of Crust |
Carbonate |
Enthalpy
change |
|
SiO2 |
59.71 |
||
|
Al2O3 |
15.41 |
||
|
CaO |
4.90 |
CaCO3 |
-179 |
|
MgO |
4.36 |
MgCO3 |
-117 |
|
Na2O |
3.55 |
Na2CO3 |
|
|
FeO |
3.52 |
FeCO3 |
|
|
K2O |
2.80 |
K2CO3 |
|
|
Fe2O3 |
2.63 |
FeCO3 |
|
|
21.76 |
All
Carbonates |
These reactions are slightly more favorable
at low temperatures. This process occurs naturally over geologic time frames
and is responsible for much of the Earth's surface limestone. The reaction rate can be made faster,
for example by reacting at higher temperatures and/or pressures, or by
pre-treatment, although this method requires additional energy.
CO2 naturally reacts with peridotite rock in surface exposures of ophiolites,
notably in Oman. It has been suggested that this process can be enhanced to
carry out natural mineralisation of CO2.
Industrial use
Traditional cement manufacture releases
large amounts of carbon dioxide, but newly developed cement types from Novacem
can absorb CO2 from ambient air during hardening. A similar technique was
pioneered by TecEco, which has been producing "EcoCement" since 2002.
In Estonia, oil shale ash, generated by
power stations could be used as sorbents for CO2 mineral sequestration. The amount of CO2 captured averaged 60 to 65 % of the carbonaceous CO2 and
10 to 11 % of the total CO2 emissions.
Chemical scrubbers
Various carbon dioxide scrubbing processes
have been proposed to remove CO
2 from the air, usually using
a variant of the Kraft process. Carbon dioxide scrubbing variants exist based
on potassium carbonate, which can be used to create liquid fuels, or on sodium
hydroxide. These notably include artificial trees proposed by Klaus Lackner to
remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere using chemical scrubbers.
Ocean-related
Basalt storage
Carbon dioxide sequestration in basalt
involves the injecting of CO2 into deep-sea formations. The CO2 first mixes with seawater and then reacts with the basalt, both of
which are alkaline-rich elements. This reaction results in the release of Ca2+ and Mg2+
ions forming stable carbonate minerals.
Underwater basalt offers a good alternative
to other forms of oceanic carbon storage because it has a number of trapping
measures to ensure added protection against leakage. These measures include
“geothermal, sediment, gravitational and hydrate formation.” Because CO2
hydrate is denser than CO2 in seawater, the risk of leakage is minimal. Injecting the CO2 at
depths greater than 2,700 meters (8,900 ft) ensures that the CO
2 has a greater density than
seawater, causing it to sink.
One possible injection site is Juan de Fuca
plate. Researchers at the Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory found that this
plate at the western coast of the United States has a possible storage capacity
of 208 gigatons. This could cover the entire current U.S. carbon emissions for
over 100 years. This process is undergoing tests as part of the CarbFix
project.
Acid
neutralisation
Carbon dioxide forms carbonic acid when
dissolved in water, so ocean acidification is a significant consequence of
elevated carbon dioxide levels, and limits the rate at which it can be absorbed
into the ocean (the solubility pump). A variety of different bases have been
suggested that could neutralize the acid and thus increase CO2 absorption. For example, adding crushed limestone to oceans
enhances the absorption of carbon dioxide. Another approach is to add sodium hydroxide
to oceans which is produced by electrolysis of salt water or brine, while
eliminating the waste hydrochloric acid by reaction with a volcanic silicate
rock such as enstatite, effectively increasing the rate of natural weathering
of these rocks to restore ocean pH.
Objections
Danger of leaks
Carbon dioxide may be stored deep
underground. At depth, hydrostatic pressure acts to keep it in a liquid state.
Reservoir design faults, rock fissures and tectonic processes may act to
release the gas stored into the ocean or atmosphere.
Financial costs
Some argue that the cost of carbon
sequestration would actually increase over time. The use of the technology
would add an additional 1-5 cents of cost per kilowatt hour, according to
estimate made by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. The financial
costs of modern coal technology would nearly double if use of CCS technology
were to be implemented.
Energy requirements
The energy requirements of sequestration
processes may be significant. In one paper, sequestration consumed 25 percent
of the plant's rated 600 megawatt output capacity. After adding CO2 capture and compression, the capacity of
the coal-fired power plant is reduced to 457 MW.
Carbon sink
A carbon sink is a natural or artificial
reservoir that accumulates and stores some carbon-containing chemical compound
for an indefinite period. The process by which carbon sinks remove carbon
dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere is known as carbon sequestration.
Public awareness of the significance of CO2 sinks has grown since
passage of the Kyoto Protocol, which promotes their use as a form of carbon
offset. There are also different strategies used to enhance this process.
The natural sinks are:
- Absorption of carbon dioxide by
the oceans via physicochemical and biological processes
- Photosynthesis by terrestrial
plants
Natural sinks are typically much
larger than artificial sinks. The main artificial sinks are:
- Landfills
- Carbon capture and storage
proposals
Carbon sources include:
- Fires (by combustion)
- Farmland (by animal
respiration); there are proposals for improvements in farming practices to
reverse this.
Kyoto Protocol
Because growing vegetation absorbs carbon
dioxide, the Kyoto Protocol allows Annex I countries with large areas of
growing forests to issue Removal Units to recognize the sequestration of
carbon. The additional units make it easier for them to achieve their target
emission levels.
Some countries seek to trade emission rights
in carbon emission markets, purchasing the unused carbon emission allowances of
other countries. If overall limits on greenhouse gas emission are put into
place, cap and trade market mechanisms are purported to find cost-effective
ways to reduce emissions. There is as yet no carbon audit regime for all such
markets globally, and none is specified in the Kyoto Protocol. National carbon
emissions are self-declared.
In the Clean Development Mechanism, only
afforestation and reforestation are eligible to produce certified emission
reductions (CERs) in the first commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol
(2008–2012). Forest conservation activities or activities avoiding
deforestation, which would result in emission reduction through the
conservation of existing carbon stocks, are not eligible at this time. Also,
agricultural carbon sequestration is not possible yet.
Storage in terrestrial and marine environments
Soils
Soils represent a short to long-term carbon
storage medium, and contain more carbon than all terrestrial vegetation and the
atmosphere combined. Plant litter and other biomass accumulates as organic
matter in soils, and is degraded by chemical weathering and biological
degradation. More recalcitrant organic carbon polymers such as cellulose,
hemi-cellulose, lignin, aliphatic compounds, waxes and terpenoids are
collectively retained as humus.[6] Organic matter tends to accumulate in
litter and soils of colder regions such as the boreal forests of North America
and the Taiga of Russia. Leaf litter and humus are rapidly oxidized and poorly
retained in sub-tropical and tropical climate conditions due to high
temperatures and extensive leaching by rainfall. Areas where shifting
cultivation or slash and burn agriculture are practiced are generally only
fertile for 2–3 years before they are abandoned. These tropical jungles are
similar to coral reefs in that they are highly efficient at conserving and
circulating necessary nutrients, which explains their lushness in a nutrient
desert. Much organic carbon retained in
many agricultural areas worldwide has been severely depleted due to intensive farming
practices.
Grasslands contribute to soil organic matter,
stored mainly in their extensive fibrous root mats. Due in part to the climatic
conditions of these regions (e.g. cooler temperatures and semi-arid to arid
conditions), these soils can accumulate significant quantities of organic
matter. This can vary based on rainfall, the length of the winter season, and
the frequency of naturally occurring lightning-induced grass-fires. While these
fires release carbon dioxide, they improve the quality of the grasslands
overall, in turn increasing the amount of carbon retained in the humic
material. They also deposit carbon directly to the soil in the form of char
that does not significantly degrade back to carbon dioxide.
Forest fires release absorbed carbon back
into the atmosphere, as does deforestation due to rapidly increased oxidation
of soil organic matter.
Organic matter in peat bogs undergoes slow anaerobic
decomposition below the surface. This process is slow enough that in many cases
the bog grows rapidly and fixes more carbon from the atmosphere than is
released. Over time, the peat grows deeper. Peat bogs inter approximately
one-quarter of the carbon stored in land plants and soils.
Under some conditions, forests and peat bogs
may become sources of CO2, such as when a forest is flooded by the
construction of a hydroelectric dam. Unless the forests and peat are harvested
before flooding, the rotting vegetation is a source of CO2 and methane
comparable in magnitude to the amount of carbon released by a fossil-fuel
powered plant of equivalent power.
Regenerative agriculture
Current agricultural practices lead to
carbon loss from soils. It has been suggested that improved farming practices
could return the soils to being a carbon sink. Present worldwide practises of
overgrazing are substantially reducing many grasslands' performance as carbon
sinks. The Rodale Institute says that Regenerative agriculture, if practiced on
the planet’s 3.6 billion tillable acres, could sequester up to 40% of current
CO2 emissions. They claim that agricultural carbon sequestration has
the potential to mitigate global warming. When using biologically based regenerative
practices, this dramatic benefit can be accomplished with no decrease in yields
or farmer profits. Organically managed soils can convert carbon dioxide from a
greenhouse gas into a food-producing asset.
In 2006, U.S. carbon dioxide emissions,
largely from fossil fuel combustion, were estimated at nearly 6.5 billion tons.
If a 2,000 (lb/ac)/year sequestration rate was achieved on all 434,000,000
acres (1,760,000 km2) of cropland in the United States, nearly
1.6 billion tons of carbon dioxide would be sequestered per year, mitigating
close to one quarter of the country's total fossil fuel emissions.
Oceans
Oceans are at present CO2 sinks,
and represent the largest active carbon sink on Earth, absorbing more than a
quarter of the carbon dioxide that humans put into the air. On longer
timescales they may be both sources and sinks – during ice ages CO2
levels decrease to ~180 ppmv, and much of this is believed to be stored in the
oceans. As ice ages end, CO2 is released from the oceans and CO2
levels during previous interglacials have been around ~280 ppmv. This role as a
sink for CO2 is driven by two processes, the solubility pump and the
biological pump. The former is primarily a function of differential CO2
solubility in seawater and the thermohaline circulation, while
the latter is the sum of a series of biological processes that transport carbon
(in organic and inorganic forms) from the surface euphotic zone to the ocean's
interior. A small fraction of the organic carbon transported by the biological
pump to the seafloor is buried in anoxic conditions under sediments and
ultimately forms fossil fuels such as oil and natural gas.
At the present time, approximately one third
of human generated emissions are estimated to be entering the ocean. The
solubility pump is the primary mechanism driving this, with the biological pump
playing a negligible role. This stems from the limitation of the biological
pump by ambient light and nutrients required by the phytoplankton that
ultimately drive it. Total inorganic carbon is not believed to limit primary
production in the oceans, so its increasing availability in the ocean does not
directly affect production (the situation on land is different, since enhanced
atmospheric levels of CO2 essentially "fertilize" land
plant growth). However, ocean acidification by invading anthropogenic CO2
may affect the biological pump by negatively impacting calcifying organisms
such as coccolithophores, foraminiferans and pteropods. Climate change may also
affect the biological pump in the future by warming and stratifying the surface
ocean, thus reducing the supply of limiting nutrients to surface waters.
In January 2009, the Monterey Bay Aquarium
Research Institute and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
announced a joint study to determine whether the ocean off the California coast
was serving as a carbon source or a carbon sink. Principal instrumentation for
the study will be self-contained CO2 monitors placed on buoys in the
ocean. They will measure the partial pressure of CO2 in the ocean
and the atmosphere just above the water surface.
In February 2009, Science Daily reported
that the Southern Indian Ocean is becoming less effective at absorbing carbon
dioxide due to changes to the region's climate which include higher wind
speeds.
At the end of glacials with sea level
rapidly rising, corals become major sinks for carbon dioxide as the reefs grow
up to the new sea level. The calcium carbonate from which coral skeletons are
made is just over 60% carbon dioxide. If we postulate that coral reefs were
eroded down to the glacial sea level, then coral reefs have grown 120m upward
since the end of the recent glacial.
Enhancing natural sequestration
Forests
Forests are carbon stores, and they are
carbon dioxide sinks when they are increasing in density or area. In Canada's
boreal forests as much as 80% of the total carbon is stored in the soils as
dead organic matter.[18] A 40-year study of African, Asian, and
South American tropical forests by the University of Leeds, shows tropical
forests absorb about 18% of all carbon dioxide added by fossil fuels. Tropical reforestation
can mitigate global warming until all available land has been reforested with
mature forests. Truly mature tropical forests, by definition, sequester no net
carbon. Growth is equal to decay and tropical soils (above 25°C) do not
accumulate humus as do temporate forests. The global cooling effect of carbon
sequestration by forests is partially counterbalanced in that reforestation can
decrease the reflection of sunlight (albedo). Mid-to-high latitude forests have
a much lower albedo during snow seasons than flat ground, thus
contributing to warming. Modeling that compares the effects of albedo
differences between forests and grasslands suggests that expanding the land
area of forests in temperate zones offers only a temporary cooling benefit.
In the United States in 2004 (the most
recent year for which EPA statistics are available), forests sequestered 10.6%
(637 MegaTonnes) of the carbon dioxide released in the United States by the
combustion of fossil fuels (coal, oil and natural gas; 5657 MegaTonnes). Urban
trees sequestered another 1.5% 88 MegaTonnes). To further reduce U.S. carbon
dioxide emissions by 7%, as stipulated by the Kyoto Protocol, would require the
planting of "an area the size of Texas [8% of the area of Brazil] every 30
years". Carbon offset programs are planting millions of fast-growing trees
per year to reforest tropical lands, for as little as $0.10 per tree; over
their typical 40-year lifetime, one million of these trees will fix 0.9
MegaTonnes of carbon dioxide. In Canada, reducing timber harvesting would have
very little impact on carbon dioxide emissions because of the combination of
harvest and stored carbon in manufactured wood products along with the regrowth
of the harvested forests. Additionally, the amount of carbon released from
harvesting is small compared to the amount of carbon lost each year to forest
fires and other natural disturbances.
The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change concluded that "a sustainable forest management strategy aimed at
maintaining or increasing forest carbon stocks, while producing an annual sustained
yield of timber fibre or energy from the forest, will generate the largest
sustained mitigation benefit". Sustainable management practices keep
forests growing at a higher rate over a potentially longer period of time, thus
providing net sequestration benefits in addition to those of unmanaged forests.
Life expectancy of forests varies throughout
the world, influenced by tree species, site conditions and natural disturbance
patterns. In some forests carbon may be stored for centuries, while in other forests
carbon is released with frequent stand replacing fires. Forests that are
harvested prior to stand replacing events allow for the retention of carbon in
manufactured forest products such as lumber. However, only a portion of the
carbon removed from logged forests ends up as durable goods and buildings. The
remainder ends up as sawmill by-products such as pulp, paper and pallets, which
often end with incineration (resulting in carbon release into the atmosphere)
at the end of their lifecycle. For instance, of the 1,692 MegaTonnes of carbon
harvested from forests in Oregon and Washington (U.S) from 1900 to 1992, only
23% is in long-term storage in forest products.
Oceans
One way to increase the carbon sequestration
efficiency of the oceans is to add micrometre-sized iron particles in the form
of either hematite (iron oxide) or melanterite (iron sulfate) to certain
regions of the ocean. This has the effect of stimulating growth of plankton.
Iron is an important nutrient for phytoplankton, usually made available via
upwelling along the continental shelves, inflows from rivers and streams, as
well as deposition of dust suspended in the atmosphere. Natural sources of
ocean iron have been declining in recent decades, contributing to an overall
decline in ocean productivity (NASA, 2003). Yet in the presence of iron
nutrients plankton populations quickly grow, or 'bloom', expanding the base of biomass
productivity throughout the region and removing significant quantities of CO2
from the atmosphere via photosynthesis. A test in 2002 in the Southern Ocean
around Antarctica suggests that between 10,000 and 100,000 carbon atoms are
sunk for each iron atom added to the water. More recent work in Germany (2005)
suggests that any biomass carbon in the oceans, whether exported to depth or
recycled in the euphotic zone, represents long-term storage of carbon. This
means that application of iron nutrients in select parts of the oceans, at
appropriate scales, could have the combined effect of restoring ocean
productivity while at the same time mitigating the effects of human caused
emissions of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
Because the effect of periodic small scale
phytoplankton blooms on ocean ecosystems is unclear, more studies would be
helpful. Phytoplankton have a complex effect on cloud formation via the release
of substances such as dimethyl sulfide (DMS) that are converted to sulfate
aerosols in the atmosphere, providing cloud condensation nuclei, or CCN. But
the effect of small scale plankton blooms on overall DMS production is unknown.
Other nutrients such as nitrates,
phosphates, and silica as well as iron may cause ocean fertilization. There has
been some speculation that using pulses of fertilization (around 20 days in
length) may be more effective at getting carbon to ocean floor than sustained
fertilization.
There is some controversy over seeding the
oceans with iron however, due to the potential for increased toxic
phytoplankton growth (e.g. "red tide"), declining water quality due
to overgrowth, and increasing anoxia in areas harming other sea-life such as
zooplankton, fish, coral, etc.
Soils
Since the 1850s, a large proportion of the
world's grasslands have been tilled and converted to croplands, allowing the
rapid oxidation of large quantities of soil organic carbon. However, in the
United States in 2004 (the most recent year for which EPA statistics are
available), agricultural soils including pasture land sequestered 0.8% (46
teragrams) as much carbon as was released in the United States by the
combustion of fossil fuels (5988 teragrams). The annual amount of this
sequestration has been gradually increasing since 1998.
Methods that significantly enhance carbon sequestration in soil
include no-till farming, residue mulching, cover cropping, and crop rotation,
all of which are more widely used in organic farming than in conventional
farming. Because only 5% of US farmland currently uses no-till and residue
mulching, there is a large potential for carbon sequestration. Conversion to
pastureland, particularly with good management of grazing, can sequester even
more carbon in the soil.
Terra preta, an anthropogenic, high-carbon
soil, is also being investigated as a sequestration mechanism. By pyrolysing
biomass, about half of its carbon can be reduced to charcoal, which can persist
in the soil for centuries, and makes a useful soil amendment, especially in
tropical soils (biochar or agrichar).
Savanna
Controlled burns on far north Australian savannas
can result in an overall carbon sink. One working example is the West Arnhem
Fire Management Agreement, started to bring "strategic fire management across
28,000 km² of Western Arnhem Land". Deliberately starting controlled burns
early in the dry season results in a mosaic of burnt and unburnt country which
reduces the area of burning compared with stronger, late dry season fires. In
the early dry season there are higher moisture levels, cooler temperatures, and
lighter wind than later in the dry season; fires tend to go out overnight.
Early controlled burns also results in a smaller proportion of the grass and
tree biomass being burnt. Emission reductions of 256,000 tonnes of CO2
have been made as of 2007.
Artificial sequestration
For carbon to be sequestered artificially
(i.e. not using the natural processes of the carbon cycle) it must first be
captured, or it must be
significantly delayed or prevented from being re-released into the atmosphere
(by combustion, decay, etc.) from an existing carbon-rich material, by being
incorporated into an enduring usage (such as in construction). Thereafter it
can be passively stored or
remain productively utilized over time in a variety of ways.
For example, upon harvesting, wood (as a
carbon-rich material) can be immediately burned or otherwise serve as a fuel,
returning its carbon to the atmosphere, or
it can be incorporated into construction or a range of other durable products,
thus sequestering its carbon over years or even centuries. One ton of dry wood
is equivalent to 1.8 tons of carbon dioxide.
Indeed, a very carefully designed and
durable, energy-efficient and energy-capturing building has the potential to sequester
(in its carbon-rich construction materials), as much as or more carbon than was
released by the acquisition and incorporation of all its materials and than
will be released by building-function "energy-imports" during the
structure's (potentially multi-century) existence. Such a structure might be
termed "carbon neutral" or even "carbon negative". Building
construction and operation (electricity usage, heating, etc.) are estimated to
contribute nearly half of the
annual human-caused carbon additions to the atmosphere.
Natural-gas purification plants often
already have to remove carbon dioxide, either to avoid dry ice clogging gas
tankers or to prevent carbon-dioxide concentrations exceeding the 3% maximum
permitted on the natural-gas distribution grid.
B eyond this, one of
the most likely early applications of carbon capture is the capture of carbon
dioxide from flue gases at power stations (in the case of coal, this is known
as "clean coal"). A typical new 1000 MW coal-fired power station
produces around 6 million tons of carbon dioxide annually. Adding carbon
capture to existing plants can add significantly to the costs of energy
production; scrubbing costs aside, a 1000 MW coal plant will require the
storage of about 50 million barrels (7,900,000 m3) of carbon
dioxide a year. However, scrubbing is relatively affordable when added to new
plants based on coal gasification technology, where it is estimated to raise
energy costs for households in the United States using only coal-fired
electricity sources from 10 cents per kW·h to 12 cents.
Carbon capture
Currently, capture of carbon dioxide is
performed on a large scale by absorption of carbon dioxide onto various amine-based
solvents. Other techniques are currently being investigated, such as pressure
swing adsorption, temperature swing adsorption, gas separation membranes, and cryogenics.
Recent pilot studies include flue capture and conversion to baking soda and use
of algae for conversion to fuel or feed.
In coal-fired power stations, the main
alternatives to retrofitting amine-based absorbers to existing power stations
are two new technologies: coal gasification combined-cycle and oxy-fuel
combustion. Gasification first produces a "syngas" primarily of hydrogen
and carbon monoxide, which is burned, with carbon dioxide filtered from the
flue gas. Oxy-fuel combustion burns the coal in oxygen instead of air,
producing only carbon dioxide and water vapour, which are relatively easily
separated. Some of the combustion products must be returned to the combustion
chamber, either before or after separation, otherwise the temperatures would be
too high for the turbine.
Another long-term option is carbon capture
directly from the air using hydroxides. The air would literally be scrubbed of
its CO2 content. This idea offers an alternative to non-carbon-based
fuels for the transportation sector.
Examples of carbon sequestration at coal
plants include converting carbon from smokestacks into baking soda, and
algae-based carbon capture, circumventing storage by converting algae into fuel
or feed.
Oceans
Another proposed form of carbon
sequestration in the ocean is direct injection. In this method, carbon dioxide
is pumped directly into the water at depth, and expected to form
"lakes" of liquid CO2 at the bottom. Experiments carried
out in moderate to deep waters (350–3600 m) indicate that the liquid CO2
reacts to form solid CO2 clathrate hydrates, which gradually
dissolve in the surrounding waters.
This method, too, has potentially dangerous
environmental consequences. The carbon dioxide does react with the water to
form carbonic acid, H2CO3; however, most (as much as 99%)
remains as dissolved molecular CO2. The equilibrium would no doubt
be quite different under the high pressure conditions in the deep ocean. In
addition, if deep-sea bacterial methanogens that reduce carbon dioxide were to
encounter the carbon dioxide sinks, levels of methane gas may increase, leading to the
generation of an even worse greenhouse gas.[48] The resulting environmental effects on benthic
life forms of the bathypelagic, abyssopelagic and hadopelagic zones are
unknown. Even though life appears to be rather sparse in the deep ocean basins,
energy and chemical effects in these deep basins could have far-reaching
implications. Much more work is needed here to define the extent of the
potential problems.
Carbon storage in or under oceans may not be
compatible with the Convention on the Prevention of Marine Pollution by Dumping
of Wastes and Other Matter.
An additional method of long-term
ocean-based sequestration is to gather crop residue such as corn stalks or excess
hay into large weighted bales of biomass and deposit it in the alluvial fan
areas of the deep ocean basin. Dropping these residues in alluvial fans would
cause the residues to be quickly buried in silt on the sea floor, sequestering
the biomass for very long time spans. Alluvial fans exist in all of the world's
oceans and seas where river deltas fall off the edge of the continental shelf
such as the Mississippi alluvial fan in the gulf of Mexico and the Nile
alluvial fan in the Mediterranean Sea. A downside, however, would be an
increase in aerobic bacteria growth due to the introduction of biomass, leading
to more competition for oxygen resources in the deep sea, similar to the oxygen
minimum zone.
Geological sequestration
The method of geo-sequestration or geological
storage involves injecting carbon dioxide directly into underground
geological formations. Declining oil fields, saline aquifers, and unminable coal
seams have been suggested as storage sites. Caverns and old mines that are
commonly used to store natural gas are not considered, because of a lack of
storage safety.
CO2 has been injected into declining
oil fields for more than 40 years, to increase oil recovery. This option is
attractive because the storage costs are offset by the sale of additional oil
that is recovered. Typically, 10–15% additional recovery of the original oil in
place is possible. Further benefits are the existing infrastructure and the
geophysical and geological information about the oil field that is available
from the oil exploration. Another benefit of injecting CO2 into Oil
fields is that CO2 is soluble in oil. Dissolving CO2 in
oil lowers the viscosity of the oil and reduces its interfacial tension which
increases the oils mobility. All oil fields have a geological barrier
preventing upward migration of oil. As most oil and gas has been in place for
millions to tens of millions of years, depleted oil and gas reservoirs can
contain carbon dioxide for millennia. Identified possible problems are the many
'leak' opportunities provided by old oil wells, the need for high injection
pressures and acidification which can damage the geological barrier. Other
disadvantages of old oil fields are their limited geographic distribution and
depths, which require high injection pressures for sequestration. Below a depth
of about 1000 m, carbon dioxide is injected as a supercritical fluid, a material
with the density of a liquid, but the viscosity and diffusivity of a gas.
Unminable coal seams can be used to store CO2, because CO2
absorbs to the coal surface, ensuring safe long-term storage. In the process it
releases methane that was previously adsorbed to the coal surface and that may
be recovered. Again the sale of the methane can be used to offset the cost of
the CO2 storage. Release or burning of methane would of course at
least partially offset the obtained sequestration result – except when the gas
is allowed to escape into the atmosphere in significant quantities: methane has
a higher global warming potential than CO2.
Saline aquifers contain highly mineralized
brines and have so far been considered of no benefit to humans except in a few
cases where they have been used for the storage of chemical waste. Their
advantages include a large potential storage volume and relatively common
occurrence reducing the distance over which CO2 has to be
transported. The major disadvantage of saline aquifers is that relatively
little is known about them compared to oil fields. Another disadvantage of
saline aquifers is that as the salinity of the water increases, less CO2
can be dissolved into aqueous solution. To keep the cost of storage acceptable
the geophysical exploration may be limited, resulting in larger uncertainty
about the structure of a given aquifer. Unlike storage in oil fields or coal
beds, no side product will offset the storage cost. Leakage of CO2
back into the atmosphere may be a problem in saline-aquifer storage. However,
current research shows that several trapping
mechanisms immobilize the CO2 underground, reducing the risk
of leakage.
A major research project examining the
geological sequestration of carbon dioxide is currently being performed at an
oil field at Weyburn in south-eastern Saskatchewan. In the North Sea, Norway's Statoil
natural-gas platform Sleipner strips carbon dioxide out of the natural gas with
amine solvents and disposes of this carbon dioxide by geological sequestration.
Sleipner reduces emissions of carbon dioxide by approximately one million
tonnes a year. The cost of geological sequestration is minor relative to the
overall running costs. As of April 2005, BP is considering a trial of
large-scale sequestration of carbon dioxide stripped from power plant emissions
in the Miller oilfield as its reserves are depleted.
In October 2007, the Bureau of Economic
Geology at The University of Texas at Austin received a 10-year, $38 million
subcontract to conduct the first intensively monitored, long-term project in
the United States studying the feasibility of injecting a large volume of CO2
for underground storage. The project is a research program of the Southeast
Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership (SECARB), funded by the National
Energy Technology Laboratory of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). The SECARB
partnership will demonstrate CO2 injection rate and storage capacity
in the Tuscaloosa-Woodbine geologic system that stretches from Texas to
Florida. Beginning in fall 2007, the project will inject CO2 at the
rate of one million tons per year, for up to 1.5 years, into brine up to 10,000
feet (3,000 m) below the land surface near the Cranfield oil field about
15 miles (24 km) east of Natchez, Mississippi. Experimental equipment will
measure the ability of the subsurface to accept and retain CO2.
Mineral sequestration
Mineral sequestration aims to trap carbon in
the form of solid carbonate salts. This process occurs slowly in nature and is
responsible for the deposition and accumulation of limestone over geologic
time. Carbonic acid in groundwater slowly reacts with complex silicates to dissolve calcium, magnesium, alkalis
and silica and leave a residue of clay minerals. The dissolved calcium and
magnesium react with bicarbonate to precipitate calcium and magnesium
carbonates, a process that organisms use to make shells. When the organisms
die, their shells are deposited as sediment and eventually turn into limestone.
Limestones have accumulated over billions of years of geologic time and contain
much of Earth's carbon. Ongoing research aims to speed up similar reactions involving
alkali carbonates.
Several serpentinite deposits are being
investigated as potentially large scale CO2 storage sinks such as
those found in NSW, Australia, where the first mineral carbonation pilot plant
project is underway. Beneficial re-use of magnesium carbonate from this process
could provide feedstock for new products developed for the built environment
and agriculture without returning the carbon into the atmosphere and so acting
as a carbon sink.
One proposed reaction is that of the
olivine-rich rock dunite, or its hydrated equivalent serpentinite with carbon
dioxide to form the carbonate mineral magnesite, plus silica and iron oxide (magnetite).
Serpentinite sequestration is favored
because of the non-toxic and stable nature of magnesium carbonate. The ideal
reactions involve the magnesium endmember components of the olivine (reaction
1) or serpentine (reaction 2), the latter derived from earlier olivine by
hydration and silicification (reaction 3). The presence of iron in the olivine
or serpentine reduces the efficiency of sequestration, since the iron
components of these minerals break down to iron oxide and silica (reaction 4).
Serpentinite
reactions
Reaction 1
Mg-olivine + carbon dioxide →
magnesite + silica + water
Mg2SiO4
+ 2CO2 → 2MgCO3 + SiO2 + H2O
Reaction 2
Serpentine + carbon dioxide →
magnesite + silica + water
Mg3[Si2O5(OH)4]
+ 3CO2 → 3MgCO3 + 2SiO2 + 2H2O
Reaction 3
Mg-olivine + water + silica →
serpentine
3Mg2SiO4
+ 2SiO2 + 4H2O → 2Mg3[Si2O5(OH)4]
Reaction 4
Fe-olivine + water → magnetite +
silica + hydrogen
3Fe2SiO4
+ 2H2O → 2Fe3O4 + 3SiO2 + 2H2
Zeolitic
imidazolate frameworks
Main
article: Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks
Zeolitic imidazolate frameworks is a metal-organic framework
carbon dioxide sink which could be used to keep industrial emissions of carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere.[53]
Trends in sink performance
According to a report in Nature
magazine, (November, 2009) the first year-by-year accounting of this mechanism
during the industrial era, and the first time scientists have actually measured
it, suggests "the oceans are struggling to keep up with rising emissions—a
finding with potentially wide implications for future climate." With total
world emissions from fossil fuels growing rapidly, the proportion of
fossil-fuel emissions absorbed by the oceans since 2000 may have declined by as
much as 10%, indicating that over time the ocean will become "a less
efficient sink of manmade carbon." Samar Khatiwala, an oceanographer at Columbia University
concludes that the studies suggest "we cannot count on these sinks
operating in the future as they have in the past, and keep on subsidizing our
ever-growing appetite for fossil fuels."[13] However, a recent paper by Wolfgang
Knorr indicates that the fraction of CO2 absorbed by
carbon sinks has not changed since 1850.[54]
List of proposed geoengineering schemes
Solar radiation management, cloud modification
Solar radiation management
Atmospheric projects
General proposals
- Reflective aerosols or
(atmospheric) dust
- Reflective metal flakes
- Reflective engineered nanoparticles
- Stratospheric sulfur
aerosols
- Marine cloud brightening
- Ocean sulfur cycle
enhancement
- Ocean mixing
- Reflective balloons
- Modified ship /aircraft
exhaust composition
- Stratospheric Particle
Injection for Climate Engineering
Cloud seeding
- Burning sulfur
- Liquid nitrogen
- Silver iodide
- Cirrus cloud seeding using
airliners to reduce reflectivity.
Terrestrial albedo modification
- Cool roof
- Reflective plastic sheeting
covering desert and glaciers
- Building thicker sea ice
Land management / Bio-geoengineering
- Snow forest clearance
- Tropical reforestation
- Grassland modification
- High-albedo crops.
Ocean schemes
- Oceanic foams
- Ocean hydrosols
- Bering Sea dam
Space projects
- Space
sunshade
- Mining moon dust or asteroids.
- Diffraction grating or lens
in space, (L1 point)
- Lunar spectrum shifting – to
accelerate chlorophyll metabolic clocks
Greenhouse gas remediation
Carbon sequestration
Biological processes
- Ocean iron fertilization
- Ocean urea fertilisation
- Reforestation
- Peat production
- Ocean mixing
Physical processes
- Biochar burial
- Bio-energy with carbon
storage
- Burying biomass
- Biomass ocean storage
- Carbon capture and storage
Chemical techniques
- Mineral carbonation /
mineral sequestration.[81][82][81][83][84]
- Carbon negative cement
- Oil shale ash
- Carbon air capture
- Ocean acid neutralisation
- Ocean hydrochloric acid
removal
Other greenhouse gas remediation
- CFC laser photochemistry
Other schemes
- Ocean heat transport
- Methane remediation


0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home